July 23, 2006

Download PDA Sermon
File
It's
Mine
When
I was a child, I was able to share with others quite easily.
I enjoyed giving to others and, for a child, was quite charitable.
That is until I got an allowance. Oh,
I would do little things around the house like cleaning dishes and vacuuming or
mowing the yard. It was then that I
was given an allowance. The money I
made from my allowance was not great or really substantial, but it was mine and
I earned it. For weeks I saved my
allowance to get one of the greatest toys humanity ever laid eyes upon: a GI Joe
action figure with Kung Fu Grip.
Oh
yes, it was mine alright and no one else was going to play with it.
One girl, Kimberly, thought she was going to play with my Kung Fu Grip GI
Joe. She was rather mistaken.
I saved up for that awesome piece of Americana and neither her nor anyone
else was going to use it. One day,
while I was in the little men's room she decided to go inside my desk to use my
Kung Fu Grip GI Joe. This was to be
her last such mistake. Like the Kung
Fu Grip GI Joe, I came at her with fierce speed and agility.
After I punched her in the stomach, I got in serious trouble.
I was forced to share the toy with her and get paddled (for those of you
too young to know what a paddling is in school, it is when the principal finds
the most aerodynamic carving of wood to meet your backside as a result of bad
behavior). I could not understand
the punishment. I got the toy fair
and square; "it's mine", I cried.
This,
unfortunately, is not the isolated incident of a selfish, second grade student.
Often, many Christians think or say the same thing.
"It's mine." The
book of Matthew records Jesus confronting people such as my second grade self;
it seems, in fact, that this has been a common response of many who claim
Christ as King, throughout history.
I
have faced no small dilemma on how to prepare and deliver this sermon.
Originally, I had planned on speaking you about Matthew 20.1- 16.
However, as I continued to study I noticed something: one cannot read the
20th chapter of Matthew without paying great attention to the previous story
about the Rich Young Ruler in chapter 19. So,
I continued my preparation on chapter 19.16- 20.16.
Nope. That would not work
either. Finally, I came to the
conclusion that I must at the very least cover the material from Matthew 18.21-20.16.
This proposes a problem- length. So,
rather than reading the passage in its entirety, I hope to share the narrative
with you by way of paraphrasing parts and reading other sections verbatim.
In
Matthew 18, beginning with verse 21, Peter asks Jesus a question that many of
the disciples were probably already thinking: how many times should I forgive a
brother or sister if they "sin against me."
Note how Peter phrases this question.
He is approaching Jesus as the victim.
He also approaches Jesus as the "good guy."
Should we forgive them "seven times, Jesus?" (Mt 18.21) Perhaps
Peter is even thinking, "Wow, I amaze myself at my piety. I am willing to
forgive someone seven times if they sin against me."
As always, God's standards are much greater than our own.
"No, Peter, you should forgive them seventy times seven" (Mt.
18.22).
At this point Jesus proceeds to tell
Peter the parable concerning the Unforgiving Servant.
In this parable, which is a metaphor for the Kingdom of Heaven or Kingdom
of God, Jesus tells the story of King who was settling accounts with his slaves,
his servants. The servant was in
serious debt; the account in Matthew is recorded at 10,000 talents.
A talent would have been approximately fifteen years wages.
This would mean, therefore, that the servant owed the King 150,000 years
of servitude or debt. This, as you
might imagine, is an impossible sum to acquire during one lifetime.
Joachim Jeremias, one of the 20th century's most devoted Christian
scholars said, "parables often contain an element of unexpectedness which
was intended to indicate where the meaning was to be found.... the vastness of
the sum {in the parable of the Unforgiving Servant} is intentional.
It is meant to impress upon the hearers" that humanity cannot pay
their debt to God.
The
servant, in the story, is also quite aware that this cannot be paid.
He then begged the King, literally falling to his knees to obtain release
from this debt (Mt. 18.26). At this
point, the Jewish audience to whom the book of Matthew is addressing is surely
expecting proper dealing by way of retribution.
This servant rightfully owes the King and therefore, he must be punished.
It all makes sense, right? When
a person owes, the person pays. When
a person behaves wrongly, they are punished.
This is the way the kingdom of the earth operates.
Like Peter who thought forgiving seven times was a gracious plenty, the
readers have likely held the same low expectations of the Kingdom of Heaven, for
God's ways are not our ways nor His thoughts like ours (Is 58. 1-3).
The true shock of the parable is that the King forgives the man the debt
which could never be paid by the servant.
After
the servant is released from the clutches of the now generous King, he sets out
to find the person who owes him a hundred denarii, an equivalent to one day's
wages. As he confronts him he yells,
"pay me what you owe" (Mt 18.28).
The man in the story represents those who have been forgiven a debt that
cannot be paid, i.e.- followers of Christ, the Church.
You see, one has to keep in mind that this parable falls under the
portion of Matthew dealing with Church discipline.
We, Church, have been forgiven 70 times 7; why is it that we cannot
forgive even the 7 measly times as Peter suggested?
We have been forgiven by the King. We
have been given a new hope which the King expects us to share
with others, yet like me as a kid with my GI Joe, we cry, "It's mine.
It is my grudge, it is my pain and I am not letting go until I get what I
am owed."
The
sad thing is that we may never get what we feel we deserve, what we are
"owed." Yet, this is not
the point. Whether or not we receive
anything tangibly in return, we are to return the same kindness and release
debts as demonstrated by our King. If
not, we will pay.
We just may actually get what it is that we truly deserve, which in this
case is the revocation of forgiveness from our Father (Mt 18.35).
After
the telling of the parable of the Unforgiving Servant, Jesus and the disciples
leave Galilee and go to the region of Judea.
It is here that they come in contact with some Pharisees.
They try test him on the subject of divorce.
Now the first few times I read through this I thought, "I am not
going to mess with this passage. Just
maybe if I skip it, no one will notice."
In other words, I tried to avoid this because it simply did not seem to
fit within the given context of the surrounding material.
This, however, is not the case. Jesus
is still talking about the Kingdom of Heaven and sharing.
The Pharisees are asking, in essence, "Can we legally get rid of a
wife by way of divorce?"(Mt 19.3) Once
again, Jesus points out that it is not humans, per se, who have brought together
man and woman; it is God who brings the two to become one flesh (Mt 19.6).
Jesus is inviting the Pharisees (as Matthew is inviting his audience)
into a new perspective. "Start
thinking about someone other than yourself.
Do you not see that you have because I am?"
Still the religious people do not perceive what Jesus is trying to
suggest. "Well, Moses said we
could do it" (Mt 19.7) Jesus
replies, "You are shooting for
the bottom of the barrel. Moses
allowed you to do it as a concession for your hard-heartedness" (Mt 19.8).
The religious rulers of the day were trying so hard to "keep it by
the book" but they missed the forrest for the trees.
How often have we done the same? We
use the scriptures as a justification for our own hard hearts?
The religious people, the Pharisees could see the script in front of
their faces, but they could not hear the heart of God who inspired the script.
Jesus closes out his conversation with the Pharisees and turns his
attention to the disciples. He tells
them that marriage is not good for everyone; some are to be Eunuchs and some are
not. Only those "to whom it has
been given can accept this placement in life" (Mt 19.11).
A eunuch, by the way, is someone who gives his or her life to chastity
for the service of a kingdom. In
this scenario it is for the Kingdom of Heaven.
At any rate, Jesus tells us that even our sexual relationships have been
given by God and we are to treat one another as a gift of God.
By becoming one, husbands and wives are sharing with one another what God
has bestowed.
Next,
we come to the famous passage of Jesus blessing the little children.
Here Jesus tells us that it is people such as these kids that the Kingdom
of Heaven belongs (Mt 19.14). Believe
it or not, unlike our culture in the modern West, this would not have been a
popular statement. When we see
children, we have been socialized to think, "there is our future.
We must take care of our children."
Whether or not that actually happens in Western society, it certainly is
a common assertion. In an agrarian
culture, most parents and adults would be waiting for their child to become
large or able enough to provide a helping hand around the land.
Children were often viewed as a burden until they were able to make a
valid contribution to society. Jesus
was telling the disciples that the Kingdom of Heaven is not like the kingdom of
the world. The world tells us that
those who are the most able-bodied, those who can produce the most amount of
goods, those who are able to make the most amount of money are the heroes.
If you don't believe me, go read the papers; go search the internet
headlines. The people, day in and
day out, that make the headlines are the strong, wealthy, the powerful
politicians with clout and influence. What
if we could tune in to the broadcast of the Kingdom of Heaven? what would that
look and sound like? "Today,
Julie Rodriguez is our star of the week. She
is an eight year old from Brooklyn, NY who gave her last 17 cents to a homeless
person. When she got home she
prepared supper for her mom, who is in the final stages of HIV.
While preparing for sleep on her dry-rotted cot, she gave thanks to the
God of the universe as she stared out at the smog laden street lights which kept
her up so often at night."
After
Jesus blesses the little ones, like Julie Rodriguez, he is approached by a
person of power, a person of influence: the rich young ruler.
"I currently have all I need for this life.
I am fully stocked and loaded with all the necessities and frivolities of
humanity. I lack nothing.
Now, good teacher, what can I do to extend this living into eternity?
What must I do to live forever?" (Mt 19.16)
Jesus then proceed to tell him that he must do everything he says
he has been doing. Jesus is calling
his bluff. "Well, I am glad you
are not killing people, committing adultery, stealing or bearing false witness.
That is good. Oh yeah, and
you have been honoring your parents which is a real plus.
The man upstairs is big on that one.
And you have been loving your neighbor as yourself!
Why that is really important. Here's
the thing though, not that all of that isn't great and all, but I want you to
give all your possessions to poor. Prove
that you love you neighbor by sharing what you have" (Mt 19.18-21).
You see there is a lot more to this Christian thing than just being
spiritual. Or should I say, there is
something tangible that happens when you become like Jesus Christ.
The rich young ruler had the spiritual talk, what many have referred to
as Christianese. What he lacked was
the walk. He thought that if he
played everything by the book that he would make it.
It was more important for him to be right than to be just, by truly
loving his neighbor.
Here
is Peter's response. After Peter has
heard the story about forgiveness, about divorce, the blessing of the little
children, and the rich young ruler, he still says, "Frankly, Jesus, we have
left everything to follow you. What
is in it for us?" (Mt 19.27) Jesus
does not appear to be amused. "All
right, Peter, I am going to try this with you one more time.
I told you earlier that the people in first place will actually be last
and the last first. This is the
Great Reversal, for the Kingdom of Heaven does not operate as that of the world.
Here is one final story and let's see where this takes us" (Mt
19.28-30). Peter, nor the rest of
the disciples get it.
Finally,
Jesus tells the disciples the parable of the Laborers in the Vineyard.
In this story a landowner and, more particularly an owner of a vineyard,
hires workers at the beginning of the day. When
he hires them, he agrees to pay them the usual daily wage.
As the day progresses the landowner goes out into the marketplace
(comparable to a downtown or inner city) to find more workers.
He does this at noon, three o'clock, and five o'clock (Mt 20.1-8).
At
the end of the day the landowner gathers the workers together to pay them.
To those who came early in the morning he gives what was promised: a
common day's wage. Then the
landowner does something peculiar- he gives the same amount of wages to those
who came last. Whether they came at
five o'clock or nine o'clock in the morning, he gave the same wage.
This severely insults the early workers sense of justice; should they not
get more than those who barely worked? I
mean, they did work in the "scorching heat" and the others were simply
there for one hour (Mt 20.12). They
approach the landowner with a logical complaint: why did you pay those people
who came last the same amount as us? (Mt 20.9-12)
The
landowner replies, "Did I not pay you the wage of which we agreed?
I choose to give to the last the same as I do you.
Am I not allowed to do what I choose with
what belongs to me? Or are you
envious because I am generous? So
the last will be first, and the first will be last" (Mt 20.14-16).
From
Matthew 18:21 to Matthew 20:1-16, there are two parables and three encounters
which interact with one another. They
build into a crescendo in chapter 20. In
each of these stories, the writer uses Jesus' words about economic issues as
symbols for the economy of God: God bestows on us that we might bestow upon
others. It is, in part, a
stewardship issue. What will do with
the grace, the gift which God has given us?
Will we horde it as the unforgiving servant who refused to release the
debt of eighteen dollars, even though he was forgiven billions?
The writer of Matthew puts these parables together to make a theological
and ultimately ethical observation- If you or I are in Christ we have been given
a gift greater than that which we can give, forgiven a debt beyond that which we
can pay. We cannot reimburse God-
that is obvious. He owns the
vineyard, the whole earth is His and everything in it; what can we give to God
that he does not already have?
No,
it is a stewardship issue. Will you
give back to others according to the gift that God, the King has conferred upon
you? This is not a question of
super-spiritual, esoteric giving; this is concrete.
God asks us if will we give that which we felt as though we have earned.
It is easy to feel like we have earned the right to hold a grudge against
someone who has hurt, or taken greedily from us.
It is a simple task to go look at one's tax returns and say, "See, I
have earned this money. I put in the
hours. I have the sweat stains to
prove it." Maybe we do.
However, that is not the question which God is asking.
I know many times I have asked God the wrong question, as Peter,
"What do I get out of it?" God
is asking, "What will you do with what I have given you?"
You
see, Church, since we are in Christ, we are in a unique placement.
All the Father has is Christ's and all Christ has is ours.
Since we are in Christ and consequently are the Body of Christ, we should
have the same mentality as Jesus Christ. The
same mentality which does not ask, "how can I keep this?
But asks, "With whom can I share this?"
Or, as it is explained in the letter to the Philippians, "Let the
same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus, who, though, he was in the form of
God, did not consider equality with God as something to be exploited, but
emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, being born in human likeness.
And being in human form, he humbled himself and became obedient to the
point of death- even death on a cross" (Philippians 2.5-8).
Who
we are now, in the body of Christ through the overflowing love of the Trinity,
is not who we were beforehand. Our
first thought should not be, "It's mine"
but should be "It is ours." We
are the Body of Christ, therefore, we take care of every part- from the least to
the greatest- and as the Body, we seek to give to others, even if they
despitefully use us (See the Sermon on the Mount).
Surely Jesus knew he would be rejected by many, yet He became a living
sacrifice for all. For those who
might accept and those who might reject. In
the same manner, we are to be Christ to those who accept and reject; it is not a
matter of someone else's response- it is a matter of your response.
What will you do with what God has given you?
Paul Jones
Paul@mulberryumc.org